Nagpur: Union minister Nitin Gadkari stated that the Ayodhya movement aimed to ensure justice for all and avoid appeasement, rather than just focusing on the construction of a temple. Speaking at a book launch in Nagpur, Gadkari emphasized that Hindutva’s history is intertwined with the history of India. He credited BJP stalwart L K Advani’s ‘Rath Yatra’ for bringing the Ayodhya Ram temple cause into the national spotlight. Gadkari acknowledged the efforts of various leaders, including Ashok Singhal of Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), Uma Bharti, Sadhvi Ritambhara, and Shankaracharyas, in their struggle for the cause.
Gadkari clarified that the Ram Janmabhoomi movement aimed to restore pride and respect for India’s history, culture, and heritage, rather than being solely focused on the construction of a temple. He emphasized that the presence of a Ram temple at the birthplace of Lord Ram symbolizes pride and self-respect for all citizens of the country. The issue, according to Gadkari, was not communal or caste-related; it was a matter of national significance.
Gadkari further highlighted that the Ayodhya Ram temple movement was a public awareness campaign advocating justice for all and rejecting any form of appeasement. He criticized the “new appeasement policy” that disregarded the country’s pride, culture, and history. He also mentioned the 2019 Ayodhya verdict by the Supreme Court, expressing satisfaction that justice was served based on historical evidence.
Quoting RSS founder Dr Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, Gadkari emphasized the need for unity among Indians, transcending caste divisions, and embracing Hindu culture, history, and way of life. He stressed that Hinduism encompasses Indian culture and that Hindutva is inclusive, without narrow sectarian or casteist beliefs. Gadkari concluded by stating that the history of Hindutva is synonymous with the history of the nation.
The Ayodhya Ram Temple movement was a significant protest against the new appeasement policy initiated by Nitin Gadkari. This movement aimed to establish a temple dedicated to Lord Ram at the disputed site in Ayodhya, believed to be his birthplace.
The protest gained momentum as it challenged the policy of appeasement, which many felt was favoring certain religious communities over others. Supporters of the movement argued that it was a matter of restoring Hindu pride and rectifying historical injustices.
Nitin Gadkari, a prominent politician, became a target of criticism for his alleged support of the appeasement policy. The movement aimed to bring attention to this issue and demand a fair and unbiased approach towards religious matters.
The movement sparked debates and controversies, with some arguing for a peaceful resolution while others advocating for a more aggressive approach. Ultimately, the movement played a crucial role in shaping the political landscape and demanding equal treatment for all religious communities in India.
Disclaimer: Only the headline and content of this report may have been reworked by Newsearay, staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed. The Article was originally published on Source link
