In Portland, Maine, a contentious debate has arisen around the potential impact of offshore wind farms on marine life, particularly whales, as the nation weighs the balance between environmental protection and the advancement of renewable energy sources.
Independent scientific studies have consistently found no direct link between the installation of offshore wind turbines and whale fatalities. These findings come amidst claims from certain political and local opposition groups, which lack empirical support.
The United States has embarked on several offshore wind energy projects, with two pilot projects already operational off the coasts of Rhode Island and Virginia. Amidst these developments, President Biden’s administration is targeting the provision of wind-generated electricity for 10 million homes by 2030, a cornerstone of its environmental policy.
However, Ørsted, a major player in the industry, recently halted two significant wind projects in New Jersey, citing financial reasons rather than the local pushback as the cause, according to David Hardy, the company’s CEO for the Americas.
Despite the politicization of the issue, there is no conclusive evidence that the limited construction of wind farms along the Atlantic Coast has led to whale deaths. This is supported by records predating the construction of significant offshore wind facilities, which began only recently. Aaron Rice, a marine biologist from Cornell University, emphasized that recent whale strandings in states like New Jersey are unrelated to offshore wind activities.
Europe’s extensive experience with offshore wind energy over the past 30 years also supports these conclusions, with no established correlation between wind farms and whale mortality.
U.S. researchers are actively monitoring marine life around wind farms to detect any potential sub-lethal effects, such as behavioral changes or disruptions in migration patterns, according to Doug Nowacek from Duke University, who is involved in a five-year study tracking whales in the region.
The primary threats to whales, as identified by experts and federal authorities, include collisions with ships and entanglement in fishing gear. Noise pollution underwater is another significant concern for these marine giants.
Environmental advocates argue that the focus on offshore wind as a threat to whales detracts attention from the genuine risks they face. Oceana’s fisheries campaign director, Gib Brogan, suggests that anti-wind groups are opportunistically leveraging the issue.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has reported an “unusual mortality event” among humpback whales since 2016, with 83 whales found dead off the East Coast since December 1, 2022. Notably, two of these were critically endangered North Atlantic right whales.
In response to concerns, the federal government has implemented regulations to limit underwater noise from human activities. Marine construction projects can mitigate their impact on marine mammals by adopting measures such as halting work during migration seasons and employing “bubble curtains” during pile driving. Trained observers are also deployed to watch for marine life.
Offshore wind developers like Ørsted and Equinor are not only complying with regulatory requirements but are going above and beyond with voluntary measures to protect marine mammals. Ørsted, for instance, refrains from pile driving during peak whale migration periods and employs additional observation tactics to prevent harm to these creatures.
Despite these efforts, organizations such as the Heritage Foundation and the Heartland Institute have voiced opposition to offshore wind projects, raising concerns about wildlife and regulatory standards. However, industry representatives like Ørsted’s Hardy dismiss these claims as politically motivated rather than scientifically based.
The spread of misinformation has led to resistance against offshore wind projects, particularly in New Jersey, where community apprehension is high. This has prompted some Republican politicians to call for investigations into the industry’s environmental impact and even propose moratoriums on new projects. Nevertheless, New Jersey’s state legislature continues to support the offshore wind sector.
Climate change is also affecting whales, altering their feeding patterns as their prey adapts to warmer ocean temperatures. This has led to increased vulnerability to human threats as whales venture beyond protected zones. Given the role of large whales in carbon storage, their well-being is not only an environmental concern but also a factor in the broader climate change equation.
Unsubstantiated claims have emerged suggesting that offshore wind farms are a threat to whales, becoming a contentious issue in the debate over renewable energy. Despite these claims, scientists have found no credible evidence linking offshore wind farms to whale deaths. The speculation began after an increase in whale strandings on New England beaches since 2016, predating the construction of major offshore wind farms.
In the United States, there are two pilot offshore wind projects, and the Biden administration has set a goal to power 10 million homes with offshore wind by 2030. Ørsted, a company that had planned two large offshore wind projects in New Jersey, canceled them due to economic reasons, not because of opposition to offshore wind in the state.
Researchers in the U.S. are monitoring offshore wind farm areas to assess any potential impacts on whales, including behavior and migration changes. In Europe, where offshore wind has been in development for over thirty years, there is also no evidence of wind farms causing whale fatalities.
The primary threats to whales include collisions with ships and entanglement in fishing gear, with underwater noise pollution being another concern. Conservationists argue that the focus on offshore wind farms detracts from addressing these real threats to whale populations.
Offshore wind developers are taking regulatory measures and additional voluntary steps to protect marine mammals, such as limiting construction during migration seasons, using bubble curtains to reduce noise, and employing observers and technology to detect whales.
Some conservative groups, like the Heritage Foundation and the Heartland Institute, have opposed offshore wind projects, citing concerns about wildlife and regulatory standards. However, these claims are not supported by scientific evidence and are seen as politically motivated misinformation.
Misinformation has led to opposition in coastal communities and has caught the attention of Republican politicians, who have called for investigations into the offshore wind industry’s environmental impact. Despite this, many lawmakers continue to support the development of the industry.
Lastly, climate change has affected the habitat and food sources of whales, particularly the North Atlantic right whale, leading them to change their behavior and making them more vulnerable to human-related threats. Whales are considered part of the solution to climate change due to their role in carbon storage within the ecosystem.
Disclaimer: Only the headline and content of this report may have been reworked by Newsearay, staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed. The Article was originally published on Source link
